Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025437›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychotic disorders: intermittent, continuous, and sham theta-burst stimulation on time perception and symptom severity.

Ann K Shinn, Aura M Hurtado-Puerto, Youkyung S Roh, Victoria Ho, Melissa Hwang, Bruce M Cohen, Dost Öngür, Joan A Camprodon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02642029 (Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02642029 nacompletednot on this map

Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (cTMS) in Psychotic Disorders: Effect on Time Perception, Executive Function, and Mood and Psychotic Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorMclean HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled28ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder IArmsExcitatory TMS, Inhibitory TMS, Sham TMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An update on the effects of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ann K ShinnPsychotic Disorders Division, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Aura M Hurtado-PuertoLaboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Youkyung S RohPsychotic Disorders Division, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Victoria HoLaboratory for Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Melissa HwangPsychotic Disorders Division, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Bruce M CohenDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Dost ÖngürPsychotic Disorders Division, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States.
Joan A CamprodonDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
McLean Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The cerebellum contributes to the precise timing of non-motor and motor functions, and cerebellum abnormalities have been implicated in psychosis pathophysiology. In this study, we explored the effects of cerebellar theta burst stimulation (TBS), an efficient transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol, on temporal discrimination and self-reported mood and psychotic symptoms. Methods: We conducted a case-crossover study in which patients with psychosis (schizophrenias, schizoaffective disorders, or bipolar disorders with psychotic features) were assigned to three sessions of TBS to the cerebellar vermis: one session each of intermittent (iTBS), continuous (cTBS), and sham TBS. Of 28 enrolled patients, 26 underwent at least one TBS session, and 20 completed all three. Before and immediately following TBS, participants rated their mood and psychotic symptoms and performed a time interval discrimination task (IDT). We hypothesized that cerebellar iTBS and cTBS would modulate these measures in opposing directions, with iTBS being adaptive and cTBS maladaptive. Results: Reaction time (RT) in the IDT decreased significantly after iTBS vs. Sham (LS-mean difference = -73.3, Conclusion: We observed a frequency-dependent dissociation between the effects of iTBS vs. cTBS to the cerebellar midline on the reaction time of interval discrimination in patients with psychosis. iTBS showed improved (adaptive) while cTBS led to worsening (maladaptive) speed of response. These results demonstrate behavioral target engagement in a cognitive dimension of relevance to patients with psychosis and generate testable hypotheses about the potential therapeutic role of cerebellar iTBS in this clinical population. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02642029.

Indexed as

bipolar disordercerebelluminterval discrimination taskneuromodulationschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID38025437
PMCPMC10679721
OpenAlexW4388646419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.