Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

ICEBERG study: an indirect adjusted comparison estimating the long-term benefit of esketamine nasal spray when compared with routine treatment of treatment resistant depression in general psychiatry.

Albino J Oliveira-Maia, Joachim Morrens, Benoit Rive, Yordan Godinov, Jedelyn Cabrieto, Nolen Perualila, Sebastien Barbreau, Siobhán Mulhern-Haughey

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02497287 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-label, Long-term, Safety and Efficacy Study of Intranasal Esketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2015 to 2017Enrolled802ConditionsTreatment-resistant DepressionArmsEsketamine (Intranasal Spray), Duloxetine (Oral Antidepressant), Escitalopram (Oral Antidepressant), Sertraline (Oral Antidepressant), Venlafaxine Extended Release (XR) (Oral Antidepressant)
NCT03373253 completednot on this map

Treatment-Resistant Depression Cohort in Europe

TypeobservationalSponsorJanssen-Cilag Ltd.Ran2018 to 2020Enrolled830ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Albino J Oliveira-MaiaChampalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joachim MorrensJanssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium.
Benoit RiveJanssen EMEA, Paris, France.
Yordan GodinovJanssen EMEA, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Jedelyn CabrietoJanssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium.
Nolen PerualilaJanssen EMEA, Beerse, Belgium.
Sebastien BarbreauJanssen EMEA, Paris, France.
Siobhán Mulhern-HaugheyJanssen EMEA, Dublin, Ireland.
Janssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (France) · FRChampalimaud Foundation · PTJanssen (Ireland) · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) affects 10-30% of patients with major depressive disorder. In 4-week trials, esketamine nasal spray (NS) was efficacious vs. placebo when both were initiated in addition to a new selective serotonin or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. However, comparison with an extended range of real-world treatments (RWT) is lacking. Methods: ICEBERG was an adjusted indirect treatment comparison using propensity score-based inverse probability weighting, performed on 6-month response and remission data from patients receiving esketamine NS plus oral antidepressant from the SUSTAIN-2 (NCT02497287; clinicaltrials.gov) study, compared with patients receiving other RWT from the European Observational TRD Cohort (EOTC; NCT03373253; clinicaltrials.gov) study. SUSTAIN-2 was a long-term open-label study of esketamine NS, while the EOTC was conducted at a time when esketamine NS was not available as RWT. Threshold and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess how robust the primary analyses were. Results: Patients receiving esketamine NS had a higher probability of 6-month response (49.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.6-53.9]) and remission (33.6% [95% CI 29.7-37.6]) vs. patients receiving RWT (26.4% [95% CI 21.5-31.4] and 18.2% [95% CI 13.9-22.5], respectively), according to rescaled average treatment effect among treated estimates. Resulting adjusted odds ratios (OR) and relative risk (RR) favoured esketamine NS over RWT for 6-month response (OR 2.756 [95% CI 2.034-3.733], Conclusion: ICEBERG supports that, at 6 months, esketamine NS has a substantial and significant benefit over RWT for patients with TRD. While results may be affected by unobserved confounding factors, threshold analyses suggested these were unlikely to impact the study conclusions.To view an animated summary of this publication, please click on the Supplementary video.

Indexed as

esketamine nasal sprayindirect comparisonreal-world evidenceremissionresponsetreatment resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID38025433
PMCPMC10669153
OpenAlexW4388042961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.