Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025361›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2023

Giant Cell Tumor: A Case Series of Seven Patients with GCT at Atypical Sites.

Kapil Bansal, Jagdeep Singh, Pranav Gupta, Subeg Singh, Rohit Kumar, Supreet Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical and imaging characteristics of giant cell tumor in patients aged 18 and below.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Rare features of giant cell tumors of the bone: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kapil BansalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Jagdeep SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Pranav GuptaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Subeg SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Rohit KumarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Supreet SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Giant cell tumor (GCT) represents 5% of all primary bone tumors and 20% of biopsy analyzed benign tumors. More than half of these lesions occur in the 3rd and 4th decades of life. There is no absolute treatment method selection. Techniques ranging from intralesional curettage to wide resection can be used. Goal is to eradicate the tumor, preserve limb function, and prevent local recurrence and distant metastasis. Case Report: We are presenting seven cases of GCT at five different and rare sites involving tibia, calcaneum, metatarsal, proximal humerus, and clavicle with tumor being limited to bone in all seven cases not involving the soft tissue. There were three male patients and four female patients. Six patients underwent intralesional curettage using high-speed burr and curette, along with adjuvant irrigation with hydrogen peroxide and normal saline followed by polymethyl methacrylate reconstruction. One patient with GCT clavicle underwent wide resection. Results: In all seven cases, we were able to able to remove the tumor completely. Six patients had a gradual and complete recovery with return to near normal activity within 6 month-1 year after surgery. One patient with proximal humerus GCT had a recurrence which got resolved with injection denosumab. All patients have been followed up for a minimum duration of 2 years. Conclusion: Intervention in the early stages can avoid radical procedures such as wide local excision or amputation. We recommend aggressive surgical approach with close follow-up to detect recurrence if any, at an early stage.

Indexed as

Burrcementingcurettagedenosumabgiant cell tumor

Identifiers

PMID38025361
PMCPMC10664210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.