Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025275›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Deep learning distinguishes connectomes from focal epilepsy patients and controls: feasibility and clinical implications.

Christina Maher, Zihao Tang, Arkiev D'Souza, Mariano Cabezas, Weidong Cai, Michael Barnett, Omid Kavehei, Chenyu Wang, Armin Nikpour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina MaherFaculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-9457
Zihao TangBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Arkiev D'SouzaBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Mariano CabezasBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Weidong CaiFaculty of Engineering, School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Michael BarnettBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8864
Omid KaveheiFaculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Chenyu WangBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
Armin NikpourFaculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning models to evaluate connectome data is gaining interest in epilepsy research. Deep learning may be a useful initial tool to partition connectome data into network subsets for further analysis. Few prior works have used deep learning to examine structural connectomes from patients with focal epilepsy. We evaluated whether a deep learning model applied to whole-brain connectomes could classify 28 participants with focal epilepsy from 20 controls and identify nodal importance for each group. Participants with epilepsy were further grouped based on whether they had focal seizures that evolved into bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (17 with, 11 without). The trained neural network classified patients from controls with an accuracy of 72.92%, while the seizure subtype groups achieved a classification accuracy of 67.86%. In the patient subgroups, the nodes and edges deemed important for accurate classification were also clinically relevant, indicating the model's interpretability. The current work expands the evidence for the potential of deep learning to extract relevant markers from clinical datasets. Our findings offer a rationale for further research interrogating structural connectomes to obtain features that can be biomarkers and aid the diagnosis of seizure subtypes.

Indexed as

connectomedeep learningdiffusion MRIfocal epilepsyneural network

Identifiers

PMID38025275
PMCPMC10644981
OpenAlexW4388419147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.