ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2023
Devices and Techniques.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical considerations in endovascular thrombectomy for distal vessel occlusions.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Thrombus Perviousness Is Associated With Differential Treatment Outcomes Following IVT and EVT in MeVO Stroke.Stroke · 2026Article
- Direct Aspiration as First-Line Technique for Acute Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion: Preliminary Results.Neurointervention · 2026Article
- Thrombus Visualization Using Low-Pressure Contrast Injection via a Small-Bore Aspiration Catheter in M2 Thrombectomy: A Technical Note.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: evolving patient selection, procedural strategies, and adjunctive therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Impact of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity on technical and clinical outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Mechanical thrombectomy in a pediatric patient with antiphospholipid syndrome-a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The evolution of personalized stroke thrombectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Magnetically powered microwheel thrombolysis of occlusive thrombi in zebrafish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Contact Aspiration Alone or Combined With Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Middle Cerebral Artery Large Vessel Occlusion.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This extensive review explores the intricacies of the three principal mechanical thrombectomy techniques: the stent retriever technique, contact aspiration technique, and a combined approach, and their application in managing acute ischemic stroke. Each technique operates uniquely on the thrombus, leading to differences in their efficacy. Factors including clot size, clot stiffness, vessel tortuosity, and the angle of interaction between the aspiration catheter and the clot significantly influence these differences. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown the overall equivalency of these techniques for the treatments of large vessel occlusion and distal medium vessel occlusions. However, there are nuanced differences that emerge under specific clinical circumstances, highlighting the absence of a one-size-fits-all strategy in acute ischemic stroke management. We emphasize the need for future investigations to elucidate these nuances further, aiming to refine procedural strategies and individualize patient care for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.