ArticleOphthalmology science2023
Using Goldmann Visual Field Volume to Track Disease Progression in Choroideremia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A 48-Month, Prospective, Multicenter, Natural History Study of Choroideremia.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Development of a conceptual, HOV-inspired spatial weighting model for quantifying geographic atrophy severity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- One down but many more to go: the state of gene therapy for inherited retinal disease.Regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Choroideremia is an X-linked choroidopathy caused by pathogenic variants in the Design: Single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Participants: We analyzed data from 238 clinic visits of 56 molecularly-confirmed male patients with choroideremia from 41 families (range, 1-27 visits per patient). Patients had a median follow up of 4 years (range, 0-56 years) with an age range of 5 to 76 years at the time of their visits. Methods: Clinical data from molecularly-confirmed patients with choroideremia, including GVF data, were included for analysis. Goldmann visual field records were traced using a tablet-based application, and the 3-dimensional hill of vision was interpolated for each trace. This procedure allowed quantification of visual field loss from data collected over decades with differing protocols, including different or incomplete isopters. Visual acuity (VA) data were collected and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution values. A delayed exponential mixed-effects model was used to evaluate the loss of visual field volume over time. Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity and GVF volume. Results: The estimated mean age at disease onset was 12.6 years (standard deviation, 9.1 years; 95% quantile interval, 6.5-36.4 years). The mean field volume loss was 6.8% per year (standard deviation, 4.5%; 95% quantile interval, 1.9%-18.8%) based on exponential modeling. Field volume was more strongly correlated between eyes ( Conclusions: Volumetric analysis of GVF data enabled quantification of peripheral visual function in patients with choroideremia and evaluation of disease progression. The methods presented here may facilitate the analysis of historical GVF data from patients with inherited retinal disease and other diseases associated with visual field loss. This work informs the creation of appropriate outcome measures in choroideremia therapeutic trials, particularly in trial designs. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.