ArticleDigital health
Mask R-CNN based multiclass segmentation model for endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscope.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in mechanical ventilation: a narrative review of clinical applications and research gaps.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Enhanced stratification of male pattern hair loss using AI through novel loss region ratio analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emerging technologies in airway management: a narrative review of intubation robotics and anatomical structure recognition algorithms.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- LarynxFormer: a transformer-based framework for processing and segmenting laryngeal images.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Scope of artificial intelligence in airway management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- A real-time interactive restoration system for intraoral digital videos using segment anything model.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to secure the airway in emergent situations. Although artificial intelligence algorithms are frequently used to analyze medical images, their application to evaluating intraoral structures based on images captured during emergent ETI remains limited. The aim of this study is to develop an artificial intelligence model for segmenting structures in the oral cavity using video laryngoscope (VL) images. Methods: From 54 VL videos, clinicians manually labeled images that include motion blur, foggy vision, blood, mucus, and vomitus. Anatomical structures of interest included the tongue, epiglottis, vocal cord, and corniculate cartilage. EfficientNet-B5 with DeepLabv3+, EffecientNet-B5 with U-Net, and Configured Mask R-Convolution Neural Network (CNN) were used; EffecientNet-B5 was pretrained on ImageNet. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to measure the segmentation performance of the model. Accuracy, recall, specificity, and F1 score were used to evaluate the model's performance in targeting the structure from the value of the intersection over union between the ground truth and prediction mask. Results: The DSC of tongue, epiglottis, vocal cord, and corniculate cartilage obtained from the EfficientNet-B5 with DeepLabv3+, EfficientNet-B5 with U-Net, and Configured Mask R-CNN model were 0.3351/0.7675/0.766/0.6539, 0.0/0.7581/0.7395/0.6906, and 0.1167/0.7677/0.7207/0.57, respectively. Furthermore, the processing speeds (frames per second) of the three models stood at 3, 24, and 32, respectively. Conclusions: The algorithm developed in this study can assist medical providers performing ETI in emergent situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.