ArticleDigital health
Acceptance of electronic medical records and associated factor among physicians working in University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptance of Electronic Medical Records and Associated Factors Among Health Care Workers in Northwest Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Digital health readiness - insights from healthcare leaders in operational management: a cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Leveraging healthcare professionals' insights to enhance data quality in medical big data platforms: A qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are digitalized medical record systems that collect, store, and display patient data. It is individual patient clinical information electronically gathered and made instantly available to all physicians in the healthcare chain, assisting in the delivery of coherent and consistent care. However, the acceptance of the electronic medical record status of physicians in Ethiopia is limitedly known due to knowledge, attitude, and computer skill gaps. This study aims to assess the acceptance of electronic medical records and associated factors among physicians working in Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians working in Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. A total of 205 physicians were included. Data were collected through a self-administered structured questionnaire. Descriptive and Logistic regression were conducted. Result: A one hundred ninety-eight participants returned the questionnaire from the total yielding a response rate of 96.6%. The proportion of those who have good acceptance for EMR was 72.2% and about 48.5%, 78.3%, and 59.6%, were sufficient computer skills, Good knowledge, and a favorable attitude toward EMR respectively. Age ≤ 30 years (AOR = 0.13 (0.02, 0.57), working experience AOR = 0.15 (0.04, 0.54), working department AOR = 0.09 (0.01, 0.90), good computer skills AOR = 8.42 (6.45, 16.02), Good knowledge AOR = 5.21 (1.22, 12.28), and favorable attitude AOR = 15.24 (12.06, 25.94) were significantly associated towards EMR acceptance. Conclusion: Generally, in this study, physicians' acceptance of electronic medical records was good. Age, year of experience, working department, good computer skills, good knowledge, and favorable attitude were significantly associated with physicians' acceptance of the electronic medical record. Improving computer skills, enhancing positive attitudes, and increasing the knowledge of the health care professionals are vital interventions to enhance and improve the acceptance of EMR system in the study area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.