Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38025069›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2023

Recent progress in the development of advanced support materials for electrocatalysis.

M Smiljanić, I Srejić, J P Georgijević, A Maksić, M Bele, N Hodnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Smiljanić *Department of Materials Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
I Srejić *Department of Atomic Physics, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Vinča, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
J P GeorgijevićDepartment of Atomic Physics, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Vinča, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
A MaksićDepartment of Atomic Physics, Institute for Nuclear Sciences Vinča, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
M BeleDepartment of Materials Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
N HodnikDepartment of Materials Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocatalytic materials are pivotal for clean chemical production and energy conversion in devices like electrolyzers and fuel cells. These materials usually consist of metallic nanoparticles which serve as active reaction sites, and support materials which provide high surface area, conductivity and stability. When designing novel electrocatalytic composites, the focus is often on the metallic sites, however, the significance of the support should not be overlooked. Carbon materials, valued for their conductivity and large surface area, are commonly used as support in benchmark electrocatalysts. However, using alternative support materials instead of carbon can be beneficial in certain cases. In this minireview, we summarize recent advancements and key directions in developing novel supports for electrocatalysis, encompassing both carbon and non-carbon materials.

Indexed as

electrocatalysiselectrolyzersfuel cellsmetal-support interactionsupport

Identifiers

PMID38025069
PMCPMC10665529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.