ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023
GCparagon: evaluating and correcting GC biases in cell-free DNA at the fragment level.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ALFAssay: A feed‑forward neural network for quantitative fragmentomics‑based ctDNA profiling in breast cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Functional footprints of homologous recombination deficiency in prostate cancer revealed by ctDNA fragmentation and transcription factor accessibility.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Knowledge-informed multimodal cfDNA analysis improves sensitivity and generalization in cancer detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- GCfix: a fast and accurate fragment length-specific method for correcting GC bias in cell-free DNA.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- LBFextract: Unveiling transcription factor dynamics from liquid biopsy data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyses of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are increasingly being employed for various diagnostic and research applications. Many technologies aim to increase resolution, e.g. for detecting early-stage cancer or minimal residual disease. However, these efforts may be confounded by inherent base composition biases of cfDNA, specifically the over - and underrepresentation of guanine (G) and cytosine (C) sequences. Currently, there is no universally applicable tool to correct these effects on sequencing read-level data. Here, we present GCparagon, a two-stage algorithm for computing and correcting GC biases in cfDNA samples. In the initial step, length and GC base count parameters are determined. Here, our algorithm minimizes the inclusion of known problematic genomic regions, such as low-mappability regions, in its calculations. In the second step, GCparagon computes weights counterbalancing the distortion of cfDNA attributes (correction matrix). These fragment weights are added to a binary alignment map (BAM) file as alignment tags for individual reads. The GC correction matrix or the tagged BAM file can be used for downstream analyses. Parallel computing allows for a GC bias estimation below 1 min. We demonstrate that GCparagon vastly improves the analysis of regulatory regions, which frequently show specific GC composition patterns and will contribute to standardized cfDNA applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.