ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Medical Humanities in Undergraduate Psychiatry Teaching: Learner Assessment and Mediators of Better Learning Outcomes.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guide to sound teeth: a syllabus-informed instructional session to provide targeted insights into the history of dentistry.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPrevious studies have found that the inclusion of medical humanities in medical education was associated with improvements in learner reflectivity and empathy. There is less data, however, on the impact of medical humanities on perceived patient care and mediators of learner outcomes. Our study aimed to determine the impact of medical humanities on perceived learner well-being and patient care, and the mediators of these outcomes in medical undergraduates undergoing psychiatric training.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2021 to December 2022 within undergraduate medical students undergoing psychiatry rotations and who attended sessions entitled "Humanities in Psychiatry." Both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained through anonymized online feedback forms. Path analysis was performed to examine the relationship between learners' perception of the medical humanities writing activity and its potential to improve their well-being, patient care, as well as mediators of these outcomes.
resultsOverall, 97 medical undergraduates (response rate 67.4%) participated in the study and more than four-fifths reported improvements in listening, reflection, empathy, personal well-being, and perceived patient care. Males showed more interest in additional medical humanities sessions (mean rank 57.9 vs 42.5,
conclusionsOur study found that the majority of learners responded positively to the medical humanities sessions, which suggests that its use could be beneficial in fostering empathy, reflection, learner well-being, and improved patient care. Using the PRISM model, we present practical implications for educators to consider when using medical humanities in relation to psychiatry training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.