ArticleJournal of medical ultrasound
An
Article in Journal of medical ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The mechanical properties of therapeutic ultrasound (US) have attracted scientific interest for thrombolysis enhancement in combination with thrombolytic agents and microbubbles (MBs). The aim of the study was to develop an Methods: Fully retracted blood clots were prepared and pulse sonicated for 1 h under various conditions. The system was in a state of real circulating flow with a branch of an open bypass and an occluded tube containing a blood clot, thus mimicking the case of ischemic stroke. The effectiveness of thrombolysis was quantified in milligrams of clots removed. An agar-based TMM was developed around the occluded tube. Results: The clot breakdown in a TMM was found to be more pronounced than in water, presumably due to the retention of the acoustic field. A higher level of acoustic power was required to initiate clot lysis (>76 W acoustic power) using only focused US (FUS). The greatest thrombolysis enhancement was observed with the largest chosen pulse duration (PD) and the use of MBs (150 mg clot mass lysis). The synergistic effect of FUS in combination with MBs on the enzymatic fibrinolysis enhanced thrombolysis efficacy by 260% compared to thrombolysis induced using only FUS. A reduction in the degree of clot lysis was detected due to the attenuation factor of the intervening material (30 mg at 1 and 4 ms PD). Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.