Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024912›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2023

Free software applications for authors for writing a research paper.

Himel Mondal, Ayesha Juhi, Anupkumar D Dhanvijay, Mohammed Jaffer Pinjar, Shaikat Mondal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Himel MondalDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Ayesha JuhiDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Anupkumar D DhanvijayDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Mohammed Jaffer PinjarDepartment of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Jharkhand, India.
Shaikat MondalDepartment of Physiology, Raiganj Government Medical College and Hospital, Raiganj, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic computer skills are essential for authors writing research papers as it has the potential to make the task easier for a researcher. This article provides a glimpse about the essential software programs for a novice author writing a research paper. These software applications help streamline the writing process, improve the quality of work, and ensure that papers are formatted correctly. It covers word processing software, grammar correction software, bibliography management software, paraphrasing tool, writing tools, and statistical software. All of the tools described are free to use. Hence, it would help researchers from resource-limited settings or busy physicians who get lesser time for research writing. We presume this review paper would help provide valuable insights and guidance for novice authors looking to write a high-quality research paper.

Indexed as

Authorscomputer skillsgrammar correctionnovice authorparaphrasing toolresearch paperssoftware programsstatistical softwareword processingwriting

Identifiers

PMID38024912
PMCPMC10657073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.