Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024895›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023

Quality in neonatal mortality audits: Results of pilot study from district of Dhule, Maharashtra.

Bhanupriya Shivshankar Pande, Aashutosh Ramkant Patel, Amit Jagannath Patil, Shraddha Patel, Mohammed Usman Shaikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bhanupriya Shivshankar PandeCommunity Medicine Departments, ACPM Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Aashutosh Ramkant PatelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, ACPM Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Amit Jagannath PatilDepartment of Anaesthesiology, ACPM Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Shraddha PatelCommunity Medicine Departments, ACPM Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
Mohammed Usman ShaikhCommunity Medicine Departments, ACPM Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As per WHO guidelines, it is important to have quality among mortality audit documents to improve outcome in health services. Objective: To assess quality of facility-based neonatal mortality audits implementation. Methodology: Mixed-method descriptive analysis was conducted. Totally, 96 death review documents were reviewed. The 25 healthcare workers were interviewed in depth. Observation analysis done for audit meetings using WHO modified checklist for quality in audit toolkit. Results: The observation of audit meetings highlighted that almost half of the members were not communicated regarding vision of audit and framework of audit and review meetings. In quantitative analysis, it was found that secondary care hospitals were not having accuracy and consistency in audit documentation. Conclusion: The quality of neonatal death audit was poor due to challenges faced by the hospitals in creating an enabling atmosphere, which can be overcome by sharing the vision of audit with the whole staff of the hospital. A standard operating procedure for audit committee to be adopted to implement action plans. Commitment, investment, and intentional leadership from everyone, including all healthcare workers, can make these ambitious goals attainable.

Indexed as

Action plansauditmixed-method studyqualitystandard operating procedure

Identifiers

PMID38024895
PMCPMC10657104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.