ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Treatment trends of benign bone lesions in a suburban New York healthcare system.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of pathological fractures on kinesiophobia and anxiety in patients with benign and benign-aggressive lower extremity bone tumors.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemical Characterization of Feline Giant Cell Tumor of Bone (GCTb): What We Know and What We Can Learn from the Human Counterpart.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of benign bone lesions is controversial as it is dependent on a multitude of factors such as age, anatomic location, comorbidities, lesion metabolic activity, surgeon preferences, and goals of care, among others. Thus far, many studies have attempted to report on these lesions; however, most are heterogeneous compilations of benign and malignant lesions with nearly all failing to report patient treatment and none of which have originated from a suburban area of the United States. The goal of this study was to establish a modern database dedicated solely to benign bone tumors to reflect current diagnosis and treatment trends in suburban New York. Materials and Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective observational study with inclusion criteria limited to benign bone lesions of all ages. Malignant lesions were excluded. Patients were drawn from both primary care provider and surgeon records, with documentation of their associated management. Results: A total of 689 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall operative rate for this cohort was 71.6%. In agreement with current literature, aneurysmal bone cysts, giant cell tumors, and osteochondromas underwent surgery more frequently than enchondromas; older patients underwent surgery less frequently; benign bone lesions were more commonly found in younger males, and the distal femur and proximal tibia were the most common locations for lesions ( Conclusion: This study demonstrates the management of a globally representative variety of benign bone lesions in a diverse suburban population of New York and should facilitate future research on how lesion type, location, management, and other factors relate to patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.