Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024804›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2023

Implementation measurement in global mental health: Results from a modified Delphi panel and investigator survey.

Christopher G Kemp, Kristen Danforth, Luke Aldridge, Laura K Murray, Emily E Haroz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher G KempDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1231-1546
Kristen DanforthUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Luke AldridgeDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laura K MurrayDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emily E HarozDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-4925

Funding

Global Mental Health Training ProgramT32MH103210 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Karen Bass, Sarah Sutherlin-McIvor Murray · 2015 to 2026
$4.0M
Evaluating Implementation Strategies to Scale-up Transdiagnostic Evidence-based Mental Health Care in ZambiaR01MH115495 · NIMH · CENTRE FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEARCH · PI MURRAY, LAURA KAY, SHARMA, ANJALI · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
Mental Health Services and Systems Training ProgramT32MH109436 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Eisenberg, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
SuSt-AInS: Sustainment of suicide prevention programs in American Indian SettingsK01MH116335 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAROZ, EMILY · 2018 to 2022
$733k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH116335NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115495NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103210NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limited guidance exists to support investigators in the choice, adaptation, validation and use of implementation measures for global mental health implementation research. Our objectives were to develop consensus on best practices for implementation measurement and identify strengths and opportunities in current practice. We convened seven expert panelists. Participants rated approaches to measure adaptation and validation according to appropriateness and feasibility. Follow-up interviews were conducted and a group discussion was held. We then surveyed investigators who have used quantitative implementation measures in global mental health implementation research. Participants described their use of implementation measures, including approaches to adaptation and validation, alongside challenges and opportunities. Panelists agreed that investigators could rely on evidence of a measure's validity, reliability and dimensionality from similar contexts. Panelists did not reach consensus on whether to establish the pragmatic qualities of measures in novel settings. Survey respondents (

Indexed as

Delphi panelglobal mental healthimplementation measurementimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID38024804
PMCPMC10663693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.