ArticleACS omega2023
Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of Levofloxacin-Loaded Floating Tables Using Various Rate-Controlling Agents.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering ofloxacin bioavailability through spray-dried HPMC and xanthan gum-based solid dispersions: enhanced solubility and therapeutic efficacy.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Influence of physico-chemical properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose on quetiapine fumarate release from sustained release matrix tablets.BMC chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Floating tablets are a new approach to extending the time a drug is in the stomach to improve therapy outcomes. Floating tablets were formulated with the drug, the polymers hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), and starch, fillers, and lubricants. The tablets were prepared using the direction compression method. The tablets' physical quality control tests were found to be within acceptable limits. The tablets extended drug release up to 12 h and were uniform in their drug contents. The swelling index of the tablets ranged from 60 ± 0.11 to 66 ± 0.14%, and the tablets were less dense than water. The floating lag time (10 ± 0.23 to 16 ± 0.09 s) and total floating time (>12 h) showed good floating behaviors. The kinetic modeling showed that the drug was released from the tablets by pseudo-diffusion, swelling, erosion, or anomalous non-Fickian diffusion. F6 (starch and CMC) showed higher n values (0.994 ± 0.04), exhibiting pseudo-zero-order drug release kinetics compared to those of other tablets. The dissolution data of the test and reference tables were not similar (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.