Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024585›Full record

ReviewIntractable & rare diseases research2023

Artificial intelligence technology in Alzheimer's disease research.

Wenli Zhang, Yifan Li, Wentao Ren, Bo Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intractable & rare diseases research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The future of Alzheimer's disease risk prediction: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Alzheimer's Disease: A Suitable Case for Treatment with Precision Medicine?Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenli ZhangFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Yifan LiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Wentao RenBeijing Dublin International College, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Bo LiuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is a neurocognitive disorder and one of the contributing factors to dementia. According to the World Health Organization, this disease has a sig-nificant impact on the global population's health, with the number of affected individuals steadily increasing each year. Amidst rapid technological development, the use of artificial intelligence has significantly expanded into the field of medical diagnostics, encompassing areas such as the analysis of medical images, drug development, design of personalized treatment plans, and disease prediction and treatment. Deep learning, which is an important branch in the field of artificial intelligence, is playing a key role in solving several medical challenges by providing important technical support for the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Given this context, this review aims to explore the differences between conventional methods and artificial intelligence techniques in Alzheimer's disease research. Additionally, it aims to summarize current non-invasive and portable techniques for detection of Alzheimer's disease, offering support and guidance for the future prediction and management of the disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningmild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID38024585
PMCPMC10680162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.