Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024505›Full record

ArticleUrology case reports2023

A new method for effective use of the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath for a giant ureteral stone.

Tomoya Nao, Ryohei Iga, Rie Yoshimura, Yoshitaka Kurano, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Kenji Tamura

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06684756 (The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06684756 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNamik Kemal UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsKidney Calculi, Kidney StonesArmsRetrograde intrarenal surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tomoya NaoDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Ryohei IgaDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Rie YoshimuraDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Yoshitaka KuranoDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Shinkuro YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Kenji TamuraDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ClearPetra (Well Lead Medical, Guangzhou, China) has recently entered the market, enabling continuous stone fragmentation and removal while maintaining a continuous perfusion field of view. The efficacy and safety of the ClearPetra renal access sheath (RAS) in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) have been reported. However, no reports have described the use of the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (UAS). Here, we report a case of successful ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) for a giant ureteral stone by effectively utilizing the ClearPetra UAS.

Indexed as

ClearPetra ureteral access sheathGiant ureteral stoneInjection of salineTamura method

Identifiers

PMID38024505
PMCPMC10630107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.