ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2023
Short-term postsynaptic plasticity facilitates predictive tracking in continuous attractors.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) plays a critical role in synaptic transmission and is associated with various neurological and psychiatric disorders. Recently, a novel form of postsynaptic plasticity known as NMDAR-based short-term postsynaptic plasticity (STPP) has been identified. It has been suggested that long-lasting glutamate binding to NMDAR allows for the retention of input information in brain slices up to 500 ms, leading to response facilitation. However, the impact of STPP on the dynamics of neuronal populations remains unexplored. Methods: In this study, we incorporated STPP into a continuous attractor neural network (CANN) model to investigate its effects on neural information encoding in populations of neurons. Unlike short-term facilitation, a form of presynaptic plasticity, the temporally enhanced synaptic efficacy resulting from STPP destabilizes the network state of the CANN by increasing its mobility. Results: Our findings demonstrate that the inclusion of STPP in the CANN model enables the network state to predictively respond to a moving stimulus. This nontrivial dynamical effect facilitates the tracking of the anticipated stimulus, as the enhanced synaptic efficacy induced by STPP enhances the system's mobility. Discussion: The discovered STPP-based mechanism for sensory prediction provides valuable insights into the potential development of brain-inspired computational algorithms for prediction. By elucidating the role of STPP in neural population dynamics, this study expands our understanding of the functional implications of NMDAR-related plasticity in information processing within the brain. Conclusion: The incorporation of STPP into a CANN model highlights its influence on the mobility and predictive capabilities of neural networks. These findings contribute to our knowledge of STPP-based mechanisms and their potential applications in developing computational algorithms for sensory prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.