Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024434›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of urology2023

Robot-assisted oncologic pelvic surgery with Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system: A single-center experience.

Angelo Territo, Alessandro Uleri, Andrea Gallioli, Josep Maria Gaya, Paolo Verri, Giuseppe Basile, Alba Farré, Alejandra Bravo, Alessandro Tedde, Óscar Rodríguez Faba and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Medtronic's HugoJournal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit with HugoInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angelo TerritoDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandro UleriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrea GallioliDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria GayaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo VerriDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Giuseppe BasileDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alba FarréDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alejandra BravoDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alessandro TeddeDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Óscar Rodríguez FabaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan PalouDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To report the outcomes of intra- and extra-peritoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery (RAS) system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Methods: Data of twenty patients who underwent RARP and one RARC at our institution between February 2022 and January 2023 were reported. The primary endpoint of the study was to report the surgical setting of Hugo™ RAS system to perform RARP and RARC. The secondary endpoint was to assess the feasibility of RARP and RARC with this novel robotic platform and report the outcomes. Results: Seventeen patients underwent RARP with a transperitoneal approach, and three with an extraperitoneal approach; and one patient underwent RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit. No intraoperative complications occurred. Median docking and console time were 12 (interquartile range [IQR] 7-16) min and 185 (IQR 177-192) min for transperitoneal RARP, 15 (IQR 12-17) min and 170 (IQR 162-185) min for extraperitoneal RARP. No intraoperative complications occurred. One patient submitted to extraperitoneal RARP had a urinary tract infection in the postoperative period that required an antibiotic treatment (Clavien-Dindo Grade 2). In case of transperitoneal RARP, two minor complications occurred (one pelvic hematoma and one urinary tract infection; both Clavien-Dindo Grade 2). Conclusion: Hugo™ RAS system is a novel promising robotic platform that allows to perform major oncological pelvic surgery. We showed the feasibility of RARP both intra- and extra-peritoneally and RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit with this novel platform.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerProstate cancerRadical cystectomyRadical prostatectomyRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38024434
PMCPMC10659963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.