Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024401›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Near-term investments in forest management support long-term carbon sequestration capacity in forests of the United States.

John W Coulston, Grant M Domke, David M Walker, Evan B Brooks, Claire B O'Dea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investing in U.S. forests to mitigate climate change.Carbon balance and management · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John W CoulstonUSDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 1650 Research Center Dr, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6619-0325
Grant M DomkeUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1992 Folwell Ave, St Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-0355
David M WalkerUSDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station through Oak Ridge Institute for Science Education, 1650 Research Center Dr, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Evan B BrooksDepartment of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, 1650 Research Center Dr, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.
Claire B O'DeaUSDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Washington Office, 201 14th St SW, Washington, DC 20227, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forest carbon sink of the United States offsets emissions in other sectors. Recently passed US laws include important climate legislation for wildfire reduction, forest restoration, and forest planting. In this study, we examine how wildfire reduction strategies and planting might alter the forest carbon sink. Our results suggest that wildfire reduction strategies reduce carbon sequestration potential in the near term but provide a longer term benefit. Planting initiatives increase carbon sequestration but at levels that do not offset lost sequestration from wildfire reduction strategies. We conclude that recent legislation may increase near-term carbon emissions due to fuel treatments and reduced wildfire frequency and intensity, and expand long-term US carbon sink strength.

Indexed as

climate legislationclimate mitigationforest carbon projectionsnatural climate solutions

Identifiers

PMID38024401
PMCPMC10662452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.