Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024268›Full record

ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

AHHME: A model for estimating the holistic cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial resistance interventions in food animal production.

Eve T Emes, Jeff Waage, Gwenan M Knight, Nichola R Naylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eve T EmesCentre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jeff WaageDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Gwenan M KnightCentre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Nichola R NaylorDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBFaculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered a global priority for human health, and reducing antimicrobial use in food animals has been suggested as a key area for interventions aiming to reduce resistant infections in humans. In addition to the effect on human health, such interventions may have effects across food animal productivity, healthcare sector costs, and the broader macroeconomy, but these effects are rarely captured in the AMR health economic literature. Without being able to estimate these effects, it is difficult to understand the true cost-effectiveness of antimicrobial stewardship interventions in food animal production, or to correctly design and prioritise such interventions. We explore and demonstrate the potential use of a novel compartment-based mathematical model to estimate the holistic cost-effectiveness of AMR-related interventions in food animal production from a One Health perspective. The Agriculture Human Health Micro-Economic model (AHHME) uses Markov state transition models to model the movement of humans and food animals between health states. It assigns values to these health states utilising empiric approaches, from the perspectives of human health, food animal productivity, labour productivity and healthcare sector costs. Providing AHHME open-source code and interactive online modelling tools allow for capacity building in AMR intervention modelling. This model represents a useful framework for capturing the cost-effectiveness of AMR-related interventions in food animal production in a more holistic way: it can allow us to capture the often-overlooked benefits of such interventions in like terms while considering distributional concerns. It also demonstrates that methodological assumptions such as willingness-to-pay thresholds and discount rates can be just as important to health decision models as epidemiological parameters, and allows these assumptions to be altered. We provide example outputs, and encourage researchers and policymakers to use and adapt our code to explore, design, and prioritise AMR-related interventions in their own country contexts.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceHealth economicsIntervention evaluationLivestockOne health

Identifiers

PMID38024268
PMCPMC10665148
OpenAlexW4386759004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.