ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2023
Global analysis of birth statistics from civil registration and vital statistics systems.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic dental age estimation in a Pakistani population: validation of Atlas methods and development of a population-specific reference model.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Missed at birth: a cross-sectional analysis of national determinants and subnational changes in birth registration coverage in Kenya, using 2014 and 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Completeness of death registration in Ghana: An evaluation of multiple data sources and methods.PloS one · 2026Article
- Spatially varying relationships between birth registration and influencing factors in Kenya, using a suite of geographically weighted regressions.Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology · 2025Article
- Sex Ratio at Birth in Northern Ireland During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison With Published Data From the Republic of Ireland, England and Wales.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025Article
- The impact of anesthesia methods on postoperative outcomes of lower limb surgeries in elderly patients over 90 years old: A multicenter propensity-matched study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Comparative performance of national civil registration and vital statistics systems: a global assessment.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Article
- Health sector leadership to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Article
- Global analysis of birth statistics from civil registration and vital statistics systems.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2024
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess civil registration and vital statistics completeness for births in World Health Organization's Member States and identify data completeness gaps. Methods: For the 194 Member States, we sourced birth registration data from the United Nations Children's Fund database of national surveys, and, where available, vital registration reports. We acquired publicly available vital statistics compiled by national authorities. We determined civil registration completeness as the percentage of living children younger than five years whose births have been reported as registered. We evaluated vital statistics completeness against the United Nations World Population Prospects' live birth estimates, and grouped countries into seven categories based on their civil registration and vital statistics completeness. Findings: Globally, civil registration completeness for births was 77%, exceeding vital statistics completeness for births at 63%. Twenty countries had limited civil registration (25% to 74% completeness) and had nascent or no vital statistics data (completeness < 25%) for births. Five countries had nascent or no civil registration and vital statistics for births. Twenty countries had functional civil registration (75% to 94% completeness) but nascent or no available vital statistics. Approximately half (96) of the countries had complete civil registration and vital statistics for births, but contributed to only 22% of global births. Conclusion: The gap in completeness between civil registration data and vital statistics for births is most pronounced in countries with lower civil registration completeness. Enhancing data transfer processes for birth registration, along with targeted investments to elevate registration rates, is crucial for yielding comprehensive fertility statistics for governmental planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.