Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38024136›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Impacts of Huddle Intervention on the Patient Safety Culture of Medical Team Members in Medical Ward: One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design.

Yi-Hung Lai, Ming-Ju Wu, Hsin-Hua Chen, Shih-Ping Lin, Chun-Yi Wu, Chun-Shih Chin, Cheng-Hsien Lin, Sz-Iuan Shiu, Ying-Cheng Lin, Hui-Chi Chen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yi-Hung LaiDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ming-Ju WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8585-4392
Hsin-Hua ChenDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-4587
Shih-Ping LinDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun-Yi WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9616-0874
Chun-Shih ChinDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4321-9948
Cheng-Hsien LinDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Sz-Iuan ShiuDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ying-Cheng LinDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hui-Chi ChenDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shu-Chin HouDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ching-Wein ChangDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A huddle is a short, regular meetings to discuss existing or emerging patient safety issues. Hospital administrators can encourage healthcare staff to voluntarily examine the potential occurrence and severity of risks, thereby enhancing awareness of patient safety. The purpose of this study is to explore the effects of huddle intervention on patient safety culture among medical team members and related factors. Methods: We used a one-group pretest-posttest research design and convenience sampled 109 members of the general internal medicine ward team members from a medical center in central Taiwan. They participated 2 times per week in 15-min huddles from 08:15 to 08:30 in the morning, which lasted for a total of 4 weeks. The process was based on submitted ideas, approved ideas, research ideas and standardization, and data on the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) were collected during the huddles' intervention pretest and posttest. Results: After the huddle intervention, we found significantly improved scores for safety attitude, teamwork climate (76.49±16.13 vs 83.26±13.39, p < 0.001), safety climate (75.07±16.07 vs 82.63±13.72, p < 0.001), job satisfaction (73.67±19.84 vs 83.39±17.21, p < 0.001), perceptions of management (77.87±19.99 vs 84.86±16.03, p < 0.001) and working conditions (78.96±18.16 vs 86.18±14.90, p < 0.001). Correlation analyses on the differences between pretest and posttest showed that age had a significant correlation with safety climate (r = 0.22, p = 0.022) and working conditions (r = 0.20, p = 0.035). The number of times to participate in a huddle had a significant correlation with teamwork climate (r = 0.33, p =<.001), safety climate (r = 0.30, p = 0.002), job satisfaction (r = 0.19, p = 0.043), and work conditions (r = 0.28, p = 0.003). Conclusion: Huddles improve clinical team members' understanding of different dimensions and relate factors of safety attitudes. Implementation of the huddles involved standardized process will help hospital administrators understand the steps to parallel expansion to other wards.

Indexed as

huddlepatient care teampatient safety

Identifiers

PMID38024136
PMCPMC10680486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.