ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2023
The hidden unicuspid: Recurring aortic stenosis post-valvuloplasty from a unicuspid aortic valve masquerading as bicuspid.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unicuspid aortic valves (UAV) account for 0.2 % of cardiac valvular disorders and present with early-onset aortic stenosis (AS) during adolescence or early adulthood. We present a case of a 17-year-old male with recurring AS. He was diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) two years previously and treated with balloon valvuloplasty, which relieved symptoms before that. Multimodality imaging work-up revealed the precise morphology of UAV, consistent with the surgical findings. The patient received a St. Jude mechanical valve (St Paul; MN, USA) which resolved his symptoms. A thorough radiologic evaluation is therefore required for the accurate diagnosis of UAVs. While 2-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) often constitutes the initial modality for evaluating UAVs, 3D-TTE, transesophageal echocardiography, and cardiac computed tomography are used as confirmatory diagnostic tools. Balloon valvuloplasty reports good outcomes in BAV but is associated with an increased rate of symptom recurrence, repeated surgical procedures, and higher mortality in UAVs, underscoring the importance of an accurate pre-operative diagnosis. Learning objectives: 1.Unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis during childhood.2.3D-transthoracic echocardiogram, transesophageal echocardiogram, and cardiac computed tomography (CT) can confirm the diagnosis of a UAV.3.Cardiac CT can additionally assess for accompanying abnormalities of the great vessels in UAV patients.4.Balloon valvuloplasty reports good outcomes in bicuspid aortic valve but is associated with an increased rate of symptom recurrence in UAV patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.