ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2023
Current standards in the diagnosis and treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma - a multicenter analysis.
Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic biomarker in oral squamous cell carcinoma - a comprehensive review.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German guideline for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) describes the recommended diagnosis and treatment procedures for OSCC and ensures the highest quality patient care. However, the current German guideline for OSCC is indistinct and therapy planning is not standardized in detail between centers. To address this, the current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in different oral and maxillofacial surgery departments in Germany were summarized using a uniform questionnaire. The results revealed high standards in oncologic maxillofacial care, but non-uniform standards exist between centers. Moreover, an increasing use of diagnostic and treatment methods that are not included in the German guideline for OSCC, such as positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) and tumor biomarkers, were used by different centers. These results support the updated German guideline for OSCC but highlight the need to consider other additive methods to improve patient care and outcomes. Furthermore, a recommendation to introduce tumor passports to simplify OSCC diagnosis and treatment should be discussed. These changes will improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.