ArticleCureus2023
Examining the Effectiveness of Telephone Clinics: A Review of a Telephone Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Clinic in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSince the outbreak of COVID-19, significant value has been placed on preventative methods for pathogen spread. One such method is the use of telemedicine via telephone clinics (TC). This article is designed to study TC in a District General Hospital in the United Kingdom.
aimsThis clinical audit aims to evaluate the use of a TC in the United Kingdom and assess its effectiveness. It also aims to assess the use of a clinician-led triaging system to select patients who would receive subsequent telephone follow-ups (TFU). METHODOLOGY: Two cycles were conducted. The first cycle was conducted in 2020 and the second cycle in 2022. In between the two cycles, a clinician-led triage system was implemented to reduce the number of patients being called back for a face-to-face (FTF) appointment. Data was collected regarding the outcomes of the appointments and compared between the two cycles. Chi-squared test statistical test was employed with a p-value < 0.05 deeming significance.
resultsOverall, more discharges were made for 2022 outcomes compared to 2020 outcomes (30% vs 19%; p = 0.03) after employing the clinician-led triage. The number of patients listed for a TFU increased when comparing the 2020 versus 2022 datasets (21% vs 12%; p = 0.026), and the overall number of patients not attending appointments decreased when comparing the 2020 versus 2022 datasets (9% vs 17%; p = 0.033).
conclusionThis article shows that for this particular clinic, an orthopaedic clinician-led triaging system allows for a greater number of patients to be discharged, lessened need for FTF consultations, and increased adherence to appointments by patients. However, much work is yet to be done concerning the long-term consequences and issues of rolling out nationwide telemedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.