ArticleCureus2023
Predict2Protect: Machine Learning Web Application in Early Detection of Heart Disease.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Across the world, there are few universal scenarios, but the pain of losing a loved one to heart disease is an exception and a reality shared by millions every year. Heart disease is the greatest killer in society today, and one prevalent root of this issue is untimely diagnosis, often caused by unsustainable costs and lack of accessible healthcare for underserved populations. Recognizing these disparities, the goal of this project was to create an easily available application and interface for all that accurately indicates one's risk of heart disease. To address this, a machine learning model, Predict2Protect, was built in Python. An open-source dataset compiled of 1025 patients of diverse backgrounds was scaled, adjusted to include inquiries answerable by patients, and split into 75% for training, 15% for validation, and 25% for testing. Four models were tested with the hypothesis that if the RandomForestClassifier was used, it would have the highest validity. This was not supported, as the DecisionTree model had a 100% accuracy for training data and 95% for test data. Through the application software Streamlit, this program was processed into a web application that is now found in browser extensions. The application reports the risk of one having heart disease with a 95% accuracy and describes the risk percentage of developing heart disease within the next year. With a simple interface and high accuracy, Predict2Protect aims to provide a view into one's health with the goals of accessible heart disease prediction and early treatment for patients around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.