Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023994›Full record

SynthesisExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on good clinical practice trials in oncology.

Veronica Agostinelli, Zelmira Ballatore, Giulia Ricci, Alessandra Lucarelli, Michela Burattini, Lorenzo Mariotti, Claudia Catani, Valentina Tarantino, Rossana Berardi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Veronica AgostinelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-1528
Zelmira BallatoreDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-4397
Giulia RicciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Alessandra LucarelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Michela BurattiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Lorenzo MariottiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Claudia CataniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Valentina TarantinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Rossana BerardiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9529-2960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became pandemic on 11th March 2020 and it deeply stressed the healthcare system. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population, so many recommendations have been approved to ensure optimal management. Clinical research was notably impacted by COVID too. This review aims to analyze the challenges occurred during a pandemic for the management of enrolled patients (enrollment, use of telemedicine visits, study procedures) and for the clinical trials system (from feasibility to selection visit, site initiation visit, monitorings, use of e-signature, deviations and discontinuations). Methods: The studies included in the present review were selected from PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect databases. Results: During the first phase of pandemic many clinical trials were suspended in accrual and, as the pandemic progressed, recommendations were established to guarantee the safety and the continuity of care of enrolled patients. In addition, lot of new strategies was found during the pandemic to reduce the negative consequences on clinical trial performance and to guarantee new opportunities of care in the respect of good clinical practice (GCP) in a bad scenario. Conclusions: Among all modifiers, investigators would prefer to maintain the positive ones such as pragmatic and simplified trial designs and protocols, reducing in-person visits when not necessary and to minimizing sponsor and contract research organizations (CROs) visits.

Indexed as

cancer patientsclinical trialsCoronavirus disease 2019good clinical practiceoncologypandemic

Identifiers

PMID38023994
PMCPMC10651351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.