Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023980›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Efficacy of scissor-type knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Neil R Sharma, Srinivas R Puli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harishankar GopakumarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL (Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Srinivas R. Puli).
Ishaan VohraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL (Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Srinivas R. Puli).
Neil R SharmaInterventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE) Division, GI Oncology Tumor Site Team, Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN, (Neil R. Sharma), USA.
Srinivas R PuliDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL (Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Srinivas R. Puli).
Illinois College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective resection technique for early cancers and large gastrointestinal luminal lesions. However, ESD is technically challenging, with the potential for severe adverse events. Scissor-type ESD (ST-ESD) knives with an inner cutting edge and an electrically insulated external coating could mitigate some of these risks. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of ST electrosurgical knives when used for ESDs. Methods: Electronic databases were queried for studies from January 2005 through December 2022 evaluating the performance of ST-ESD knives. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I Results: Final analysis included data from 17 studies comprising 1652 ESD procedures. The pooled en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 97.94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.20-98.57) and 94.32% (95%CI 93.11-95.43), respectively. The main adverse events were perforation and delayed post-procedural bleeding, with pooled rates of 1.07% (95%CI 0.63-1.62) and 1.86% (95%CI 1.26-2.56), respectively. There was no heterogeneity, as indicated by an I Conclusions: Our analysis shows that ST-ESD knives deliver consistently good performance across various locations in the gastrointestinal lumen and lesion sizes, with a good safety profile. This could be particularly appealing to newer adopters of ESD.

Indexed as

Endoscopic submucosal dissectionESD knifegrasping-type knifescissor-type knife

Identifiers

PMID38023980
PMCPMC10662071
OpenAlexW4388431064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.