Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023972›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology

Is there a direct relationship between hiatal hernia size, esophageal body hypomotility and symptomatic perception of gastroesophageal reflux episodes?

Theodoros Voulgaris, Shintaro Hoshino, Etsuro Yazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theodoros VoulgarisBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Upper GI Physiology Unit Royal London Hospital, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (Theodoros Voulgaris, Shintaro Hoshino, Etsuro Yazaki).
Shintaro HoshinoBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Upper GI Physiology Unit Royal London Hospital, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (Theodoros Voulgaris, Shintaro Hoshino, Etsuro Yazaki).
Etsuro YazakiBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Upper GI Physiology Unit Royal London Hospital, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK (Theodoros Voulgaris, Shintaro Hoshino, Etsuro Yazaki).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is classified into 3 anatomical subtypes according to lower esophageal sphincter-crural diaphragm (LES-CD) separation. We aimed to assess their relationship to esophageal motility, reflux characteristics, and symptom perception. Methods: We analyzed data from 1740 consecutive patients with typical reflux symptoms, who underwent high resolution manometry and a 24-h pH-impedance study during a 13-year period. A diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was made if acid exposure time (AET) was >6%. EGJ types were classified as 1, 2, or 3, if LES-CD separation was up to 1 cm, 1-3 cm, or ≥3 cm, respectively. Results: EGJ type distribution was 72.2%, 22.1% and 5.7%, for types 1, 2 and 3, respectively. GERD was diagnosed in 31.2% and was more common among patients with EGJ type 2/3 vs. 1 (P<0.001). Length of LES-CD separation significantly correlated with AET and number of reflux episodes. Patients with type 2 or 3 EGJ more often showed ineffective or absent peristalsis compared with type 1 (P=0.008 and P<0.001 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, EGJ type 2/3 correlated with AET (P=0.001) and reflux episodes (P=0.041) but not with positive symptomatic markers or with ineffective/absent peristalsis. Conclusions: Our study confirms that EGJ anatomical morphology is a strong risk factor for GERD and correlates with both AET and the number of reflux events, though the length of separation is more important than the type. The multivariate analysis revealed that EGJ type 2 or 3 was not correlated with symptom perception or esophageal hypomotility.

Indexed as

acid exposure timeesophageal hypomotilityesophageal symptom perceptionEsophagogastric junctiongastroesophageal reflux disease

Identifiers

PMID38023972
PMCPMC10662063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.