Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023948›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2023

A qualitative study exploring healthcare workers' lived experiences of the impacts of COVID-19 policies and guidelines on maternal and reproductive healthcare services in the United Kingdom.

Jonathan Chaloner, Irtiza Qureshi, Mayuri Gogoi, Winifred C Ekezie, Amani Al-Oraibi, Fatimah Wobi, Joy O Agbonmwandolor, Laura B Nellums, Manish Pareek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of midwifery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan ChalonerDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Irtiza QureshiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Mayuri GogoiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Winifred C EkezieDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Amani Al-OraibiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Fatimah WobiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Joy O AgbonmwandolorNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Laura B NellumsLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Manish PareekDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women were regarded as vulnerable to poor health outcomes if infected with the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) virus. To protect the United Kingdom's (UK) National Health Service (NHS) and pregnant patients, strict infection control policies and regulations were implemented. This study aimed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 policies and guidelines on maternal and reproductive health services during the pandemic from the experiences of healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for these patients.

methodsThis qualitative study involved HCWs from the United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) project. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted online or by telephone with 44 diverse HCWs. Transcripts were thematically analyzed following Braun and Clarke's principles of qualitative analysis.

resultsThree key themes were identified during analysis. First, infection control policies impacted appointment availability, resulting in many cancellations and delays to treatment. Telemedicine was also used extensively to reduce risks from face-to-face consultations, disadvantaging patients from minoritized ethnicities. Secondly, staff shortages and redeployments reduced availability of consultations, appointments, and sonography scans. Finally, staff and patients reported challenges accessing timely, reliable and accurate information and guidance.

conclusionsCOVID-19 demonstrated how a global health crisis can impact maternal and reproductive health services, leading to reduced service quality and surgical delays due to staff redeployment policies. Our findings underscore the implications of policy and future health crises preparedness. This includes tailored infection control policies, addressing elective surgery backlogs early and improved dissemination of relevant vaccine information.

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare workersinfection controlspolicies and guidelinesredeploymentvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID38023948
PMCPMC10630987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.