ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2023
Midwives' experiences with aortic compression for postpartum hemorrhage: A qualitative study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Women´s experiences with being exposed to external aortic compression in the management of postpartum hemorrhage: a qualitative study in Norway.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to examine midwives' firsthand experience with aortic compression during postpartum hemorrhage. Severe postpartum hemorrhage is a critical complication during childbirth and the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Active management of the third stage of labor, combined with standard treatment, has reduced the incidence. However, these measures occasionally fall short, and there is a global need for easy, effective alternative methods. Aortic compression, though not widely recognized, is employed intermittently and lacks substantial scientific backing.
methodsThis qualitative study comprised interviews with midwives from various healthcare settings across Norway. Over a two-month period in 2022, we conducted seven individual semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step process.
resultsFour prominent themes emerged from the analysis, reflecting midwives' experiences with aortic compression in managing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). In their experiences with aortic compression, midwives uncovered its dual qualities of being both easy and effective. Their utilization of the technique was experience-based only, shaped by personal experience rather than formal training. Nevertheless, aortic compression was perceived as the first-line response to suspected postpartum hemorrhage, preventing escalation, and offering a clearer view of the situation to facilitate timely treatment. Most significantly, midwives recognized aortic compression as a crucial intervention that reduces blood loss and improves health.
conclusionsPostpartum hemorrhage is a feared situation in the delivery room. The participants consider that aortic compression may affect maternal health and mortality. However, further research is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.