Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023905›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Optimising clonal performance in sugarcane: leveraging non-additive effects via mate-allocation strategies.

Seema Yadav, Elizabeth M Ross, Xianming Wei, Owen Powell, Valentin Hivert, Lee T Hickey, Felicity Atkin, Emily Deomano, Karen S Aitken, Kai P Voss-Fels and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Optimising parent selection in plant breeding: comparing metaheuristic algorithms for genotype building.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Seema YadavQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Elizabeth M RossQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Xianming WeiSugar Research Australia, Mackay, QLD, Australia.
Owen PowellQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Valentin HivertInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Lee T HickeyQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Felicity AtkinSugar Research Australia, Meringa Gordonvale, QLD, Australia.
Emily DeomanoSugar Research Australia, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia.
Karen S AitkenAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Brisbane, QlD, Australia.
Kai P Voss-FelsQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ben J HayesQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
University of Queensland · AUSugar Research Australia (Australia) · AUAgriculture and Food · AUARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate-allocation strategies in breeding programs can improve progeny performance by harnessing non-additive genetic effects. These approaches prioritise predicted progeny merit over parental breeding value, making them particularly appealing for clonally propagated crops such as sugarcane. We conducted a comparative analysis of mate-allocation strategies, exploring utilising non-additive and heterozygosity effects to maximise clonal performance with schemes that solely consider additive effects to optimise breeding value. Using phenotypic and genotypic data from a population of 2,909 clones evaluated in final assessment trials of Australian sugarcane breeding programs, we focused on three important traits: tonnes of cane per hectare (TCH), commercial cane sugar (CCS), and Fibre. By simulating families from all possible crosses (1,225) with 50 progenies each, we predicted the breeding and clonal values of progeny using two models: GBLUP (considering additive effects only) and extended-GBLUP (incorporating additive, non-additive, and heterozygosity effects). Integer linear programming was used to identify the optimal mate-allocation among selected parents. Compared to breeding value-based approaches, mate-allocation strategies based on clonal performance yielded substantial improvements, with predicted progeny values increasing by 57% for TCH, 12% for CCS, and 16% for fibre. Our simulation study highlights the effectiveness of mate-allocation approaches that exploit non-additive and heterozygosity effects, resulting in superior clonal performance. However, there was a notable decline in additive gain, particularly for TCH, likely due to significant epistatic effects. When selecting crosses based on clonal performance for TCH, the inbreeding coefficient of progeny was significantly lower compared to random mating, underscoring the advantages of leveraging non-additive and heterozygosity effects in mitigating inbreeding depression. Thus, mate-allocation strategies are recommended in clonally propagated crops to enhance clonal performance and reduce the negative impacts of inbreeding.

Indexed as

additivebreeding valueclonal performancedominanceheterozygositymate-allocationnon-additive effectssugarcane

Identifiers

PMID38023905
PMCPMC10667552
OpenAlexW4388703746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.