ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Towards practical object detection for weed spraying in precision agriculture.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Modular Vision System for Practical Object Detection on Resource-Constrained Humanoid Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review of Robotic Weeding Modalities for Site-Specific Weed Management.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Automatic Polygon Annotation of Plant Objects for Training Dataset Preparation in Green Biomass Segmentation Tasks.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- ASSET-DETR: a relation-aware multi-scale feature arbitration network for real-time weed detection in sugar beet fields.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- A sustainable crop protection through integrated technologies: UAV-based detection, real-time pesticide mixing, and adaptive spraying.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- BED-YOLO: An Enhanced YOLOv10n-Based Tomato Leaf Disease Detection Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based approaches for weed detection in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- PD-YOLO: a novel weed detection method based on multi-scale feature fusion.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- FGA-Corn: an integrated system for precision pesticide application in center leaf areas using deep learning vision.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Automated weed monitoring and control: enhancing detection accuracy using a YOLOv7-AlexNet fusion network.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- YOLO-RSTS: a precise segmentation model for detecting preservative and stimulant spraying regions on rubber trees.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Research Progress on Plant Responses to Stress Combinations in the Context of Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mushroom Detection and Three Dimensional Pose Estimation from Multi-View Point Clouds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Use of synthetic images for training a deep learning model for weed detection and biomass estimation in cotton.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Multi-modal and multi-view image dataset for weeds detection in wheat field.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weeds pose a persistent threat to farmers' yields, but conventional methods for controlling weed populations, like herbicide spraying, pose a risk to the surrounding ecosystems. Precision spraying aims to reduce harms to the surrounding environment by targeting only the weeds rather than spraying the entire field with herbicide. Such an approach requires weeds to first be detected. With the advent of convolutional neural networks, there has been significant research trialing such technologies on datasets of weeds and crops. However, the evaluation of the performance of these approaches has often been limited to the standard machine learning metrics. This paper aims to assess the feasibility of precision spraying via a comprehensive evaluation of weed detection and spraying accuracy using two separate datasets, different image resolutions, and several state-of-the-art object detection algorithms. A simplified model of precision spraying is proposed to compare the performance of different detection algorithms while varying the precision of the spray nozzles. The key performance indicators in precision spraying that this study focuses on are a high weed hit rate and a reduction in herbicide usage. This paper introduces two metrics, namely, weed coverage rate and area sprayed, to capture these aspects of the real-world performance of precision spraying and demonstrates their utility through experimental results. Using these metrics to calculate the spraying performance, it was found that 93% of weeds could be sprayed by spraying just 30% of the area using state-of-the-art vision methods to identify weeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.