Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Fostering

Christina Kägi, Blaise Petitpierre, Philipp Meyer, Yvonne Lötscher, Stefan Eggenberg, Sylvain Aubry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina Kägi *Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER, Bern, Switzerland.
Blaise Petitpierre *Infoflora, c/o Botanischer Garten, Bern, Switzerland.
Philipp MeyerFederal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER, Bern, Switzerland.
Yvonne LötscherFederal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefan EggenbergInfoflora, c/o Botanischer Garten, Bern, Switzerland.
Sylvain AubryFederal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most plant conservation strategies generally overlook the intra-specific genetic diversity of crop gene pools. Focusing on forage crops and their wild relatives, we present a novel approach to address the conservation of these species on meadows. Two-thirds of Swiss agricultural land is green land, mostly used for forage purposes, and their genetic diversity is being threatened. We focused here on eight plant associations gathering at least 18 taxa considered priority crop wild relatives of forage crops. Since 2020, about 1,217 high-quality surfaces (representing 1,566 hectares) nationwide have been integrated into an innovative auction-based policy instrument dedicated to conserving these populations. Here, we report the benefits and hurdles of implementing this bottom-up approach and try to estimate the quality of conservation of the forage plants' CWR gene pool. Although we focus on the Swiss case, our approach to

Indexed as

crop wild relativesforage cropsgenetic diversitygrasslandin situ conservationspecies distribution modelling (SDM)

Identifiers

PMID38023832
PMCPMC10643147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.