Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023776›Full record

ArticlemHealth2023

Refining an ecological momentary assessment study of binge eating among sexual minority and heterosexual young women: a mixed methods pilot study.

Kristin E Heron, Charlotte A Dawson, Cassidy M Sandoval, Lauren V Butler, Abby L Braitman, Alison Cerezo, Robin J Lewis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin E HeronDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Charlotte A DawsonVirginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Cassidy M SandovalVirginia Consortium Program in Clinical Psychology, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Lauren V ButlerDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Abby L BraitmanDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Alison CerezoDepartment of Counseling, University of California Santa Barbara, Clinical, & School Psychology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Robin J LewisDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Virginia Clinical Research · USOld Dominion University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Examining binge eating in daily life: Working toward reducing obesity disparities in racially diverse lesbian and heterosexual womenR01MD012598 · NIMHD · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI HERON, KRISTIN E · 2019 to 2022
$1.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD012598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is used to capture daily lived experiences, states, and environments. Although EMA is commonly used in behavioral health research, there remains a dearth of literature on how researchers account for design considerations of EMA techniques when designing studies. The goal of this formative mixed methods study was to elicit feedback on EMA study procedures and materials from the target populations for a larger study about binge eating among sexual minority and heterosexual young women, in which data are collected entirely remotely. Methods: Sexual minority (n=12) and heterosexual (n=9) women ages 18-30 who binge ate took part in a pilot EMA study and exit interview and survey. As part of the consent and orientation process, participants reviewed video and written materials describing the study purpose and procedures. Using a smartphone app, for seven consecutive days they completed a survey each morning, 5 random surveys per day, and self-initiated a survey each time they binge ate. Participants then provided feedback on the study via a 1-hour virtual interview and online survey. Interviews were transcribed and reviewed by two coders to identify themes on the acceptability and feasibility of the EMA procedures with a focus on: (I) the training and study description materials; (II) general smartphone app and survey preferences; and (III) specific EMA survey question content and wording. Results: The qualitative and quantitative data converged to suggest participants were able to easily download and use the app to complete surveys and report on binge eating events. Participants provided feedback that was incorporated into revisions on general study procedures, the training video content, and EMA question content for binge eating, identity-related stressors, and appearance-related pressures. No systematic themes in the quantitative or qualitative data emerged to suggest questions were perceived differently by sexual minority and heterosexual young women. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for the feasibility of conducting a remote EMA study to assess young women's experiences around binge eating. This formative study provides an example of how a mixed methods approach can be used to refine EMA study methods and questions to improve study design.

Indexed as

binge eatingEcological momentary assessment (EMA)health disparitiesmixed methodssexual minority women

Identifiers

PMID38023776
PMCPMC10643268
OpenAlexW4387815813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.