In one paragraphArticle in ZooKeys, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Olivier S G PauwelsScientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Scientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-5496 Jonathan BreckoScientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Scientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2969-4566 Dimitri BaegheEvolutionary Biology and Ecology (CP 160/12), Department of Organismic Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-5954 Jeroen VenderickxScientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Scientific Heritage, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4487-2009 Ann VanderheydenBarcoding Facility for Organisms and Tissues of Policy Concern (BopCo), Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Barcoding Facility for Organisms and Tissues of Policy Concern (BopCo), Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2823-0855 Thierry BackeljauBarcoding Facility for Organisms and Tissues of Policy Concern (BopCo), Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium Barcoding Facility for Organisms and Tissues of Policy Concern (BopCo), Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Brussels Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-9727 Institute of Natural Sciences · BERoyal Museum for Central Africa · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Using external morphology of adults and tadpoles, osteology from high-resolution microcomputed tomography, vocalization analysis, and DNA sequence data, the identity of a reproducing Belgian population of invasive
Indexed as
AmphibiansFrancefreshwater biodiversityinvasive speciesmorphologyphylogenySouth Africasystematicstaxonomy
Identifiers
PMID38023767
PMCPMC10664028
OpenAlexW4388655448
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390