Restoring the Anatomy of Long Bones with Large Septic Non-Union Defects with the Masquelet Technique.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following non-union surgery: ongoing remodeling and improvement in clinical findings after five years.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026
   Article
2. Long-term outcomes of vascularized fibular grafting for infected non-union of the lower limb: a competing-risk analysis.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2026
   Article
3. Effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in aseptic and infected long-bone defect management: Are there any differences?World journal of orthopedics · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.