Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023713›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2023

Histological assessment of nanostructured fibrin-agarose skin substitutes grafted in burnt patients. A time-course study.

Miguel Angel Martin-Piedra, Gloria Carmona, Fernando Campos, Víctor Carriel, Ana Fernández-González, Antonio Campos, Natividad Cuende, Ingrid Garzón, Purificación Gacto, Miguel Alaminos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miguel Angel Martin-PiedraTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-3175
Gloria CarmonaAndalusian Network for the Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies (former Andalusian Initiative for Advanced Therapies) - Fundación Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain; Andalusian Transplant Coordination, Servicio Andaluz de Salud Seville Spain.
Fernando CamposTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.
Víctor CarrielTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8114-5644
Ana Fernández-GonzálezInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA Granada Spain.
Antonio CamposTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.
Natividad CuendeAndalusian Network for the Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies (former Andalusian Initiative for Advanced Therapies) - Fundación Andaluza Progreso y Salud, Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain; Andalusian Transplant Coordination, Servicio Andaluz de Salud Seville Spain.
Ingrid GarzónTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-0578
Purificación GactoBurn Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío Seville Spain.
Miguel AlaminosTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology University of Granada Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4876-2672
Universidad de Granada · ESAndalusian Health Service · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previously developed fibrin-agarose skin model-UGRSKIN-showed promising clinical results in severely burnt patients. To determine the histological parameters associated to the biocompatibility and therapeutic effects of this model, we carried out a comprehensive structural and ultrastructural study of UGRSKIN grafted in severely burnt patients after 3 months of follow-up. The grafted epidermis was analogue to native human skin from day 30th onward, revealing well-structured strata with well-differentiated keratinocytes expressing CK5, CK8, CK10, claudin, plakoglobin, filaggrin, and involucrin in a similar way to controls, suggesting that the epidermis was able to mature and differentiate very early. Melanocytes and Langerhans cells were found from day 30th onward, together with a basement membrane, abundant hemidesmosomes and lack of rete ridges. At the dermal layer, we found an interface between the grafted skin and the host tissue at day 30th, which tended to disappear with time. The grafted superficial dermis showed a progressive increase in properly-oriented collagen fibers, elastic fibers and proteoglycans, including decorin, similarly to control dermis at day 60-90th of in vivo follow-up. Blood vessels determined by CD31 and SMA expression were more abundant in grafted skin than controls, whereas lymphatic vessels were more abundant at day 90th. These results contribute to shed light on the histological parameters associated to biocompatibility and therapeutic effect of the UGRSKIN model grafted in patients and demonstrate that the bioengineered skin grafted in patients is able to mature and differentiate very early at the epithelial level and after 60-90 days at the dermal level.

Indexed as

artificial skinburnt patientshistologytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID38023713
PMCPMC10658487
OpenAlexW4383536163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.