Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023632›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023

E-prescribing and medication safety in community settings: A rapid scoping review.

Christine E Cassidy, Leah Boulos, Erin McConnell, Brittany Barber, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Andrea Bishop, Nawal Fatima, Amanda Higgins, Megan Churchill, Allison Lively and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine E CassidyDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Leah BoulosMaritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Erin McConnellDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Brittany BarberIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Alannah Delahunty-PikeIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Andrea BishopNova Scotia College of Pharmacists, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nawal FatimaDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Amanda HigginsIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Megan ChurchillIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Allison LivelyNova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shannon P MacPheeIWK Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ruth Martin MisenerDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Rowan SartyNova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Robert WellsPatient Partner, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Janet A CurranDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CADalhousie University · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CANova Scotia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medication prescribing is essential for the treatment, curing, maintenance, and/or prevention of an illness and disease, however, medication errors remain common. Common errors including prescribing and administration, pose significant risk to patients. Electronic prescribing (e-prescribing) is one intervention used to enhance the safety and quality of prescribing by decreasing medication errors and reducing harm. Objective: To map and characterize the current evidence on e-prescribing and medication safety in community pharmacy settings. Methods: We conducted a rapid scoping review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies reporting on e-prescribing and medication safety. MEDLINE All (OVID), Embase (Elsevier), CINAHL Full Text (EBSCOHost), and Scopus (Elsevier) databases were searched December 2022 using keywords and MeSH terms related to e-prescribing, medication safety, efficiency, and uptake. Articles were imported to Covidence and screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by a single reviewer and verified by a second reviewer using a standardized data extraction form. Findings are reported in accordance with JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis following thematic analysis to narratively describe results. Results: Thirty-five studies were included in this review. Most studies were quantitative ( Conclusions: Findings indicate that most research is descriptive in nature and focused primarily on rates of prescription errors. Further research, such as experimental, implementation, and evaluation mixed-methods research, is needed to investigate the effects of e-prescribing on reducing error rates and improving patient and health system outcomes.

Indexed as

Medication errorsMedication safetyPharmacyScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38023632
PMCPMC10679534
OpenAlexW4388461531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.