Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023545›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Better Existing Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Can Reduce the Risk of Cholera in an Endemic Setting: Results From a Prospective Cohort Study From Kolkata, India.

Md Taufiqul Islam, Justin Im, Faisal Ahmmed, Deok Ryun Kim, Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse, Sophie Kang, Farhana Khanam, Fahima Chowdhury, Tasnuva Ahmed, Md Golam Firoj and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk assessment of cholera outbreaks in Eastern Visayas, Philippines, 2024.Western Pacific surveillance and response journal : WPSAR
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 7 countries.

Md Taufiqul IslamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-484X
Justin ImEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-084X
Faisal AhmmedInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Deok Ryun KimEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Birkneh Tilahun TadesseEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sophie KangEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Farhana KhanamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-5995
Fahima ChowdhuryInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tasnuva AhmedInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Golam FirojInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Asma Binte AzizEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-5744
Masuma HoqueInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Juyeon ParkEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyon Jin JeonEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Suman KanungoNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Shanta DuttaNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Khalequ ZamanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashraful Islam KhanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Florian MarksEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-7170
Jerome H KimEpidemiology, Public Health, Impact Unit, International Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Firdausi QadriInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
John D ClemensInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDInternational Vaccine Institute · KRIndian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global cholera control efforts rely heavily on effective water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in cholera-endemic settings. Methods: Using data from a large, randomized controlled trial of oral cholera vaccine conducted in Kolkata, India, we evaluated whether natural variations in WASH in an urban slum setting were predictive of cholera risk. From the control population (n = 55 086), baseline WASH data from a randomly selected "training subpopulation" (n = 27 634) were analyzed with recursive partitioning to develop a dichotomous ("better" vs "not better") composite household WASH variable from several WASH features collected at baseline, and this composite variable was then evaluated in a mutually exclusive "validation population" (n = 27 452). We then evaluated whether residents of better WASH households in the entire population (n = 55 086) experienced lower cholera risk using Cox regression models. Better WASH was defined by a combination of 4 dichotomized WASH characteristics including safe source of water for daily use, safe source of drinking water, private or shared flush toilet use, and always handwashing with soap after defecation. Results: Residence in better WASH households was associated with a 30% reduction in risk of cholera over a 5-year period (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% confidence interval, .49-.99]; Conclusions: The evidence suggests that modest improvements in WASH facilities and behaviors significantly modify cholera risk and may be an important component of cholera prevention and elimination strategies in endemic settings.

Indexed as

choleraendemic settingsWASH

Identifiers

PMID38023545
PMCPMC10662546
OpenAlexW4388871183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.