Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023508›Full record

ReviewChemical science2023

Sustainable formulation polymers for home, beauty and personal care: challenges and opportunities.

Christina A R Picken, Orla Buensoz, Paul D Price, Christopher Fidge, Laurie Points, Michael P Shaver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina A R PickenDepartment of Materials, Henry Royce Institute, The University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL UK michael.shaver@manchester.ac.uk.
Orla BuensozDepartment of Materials, Henry Royce Institute, The University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL UK michael.shaver@manchester.ac.uk.
Paul D PriceUnilever R&D, Port Sunlight Laboratory Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW UK.
Christopher FidgeUnilever R&D, Port Sunlight Laboratory Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW UK.
Laurie PointsUnilever R&D, Port Sunlight Laboratory Quarry Road East, Bebington, Wirral CH63 3JW UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-569X
Michael P ShaverDepartment of Materials, Henry Royce Institute, The University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL UK michael.shaver@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-6750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As society moves towards a net-zero future, the need to adopt more sustainable polymers is well understood, and as well as plastics, less visible formulation polymers should also be included within this shift. As researchers, industries and consumers move towards more sustainable products there is a clear need to define what sustainability means in fast moving consumer goods and how it can be considered at the design stage. In this perspective key challenges in achieving sustainable formulation polymers are highlighted, and opportunities to overcome them are presented.

Identifiers

PMID38023508
PMCPMC10664511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.