ArticleInfection and drug resistance2023
Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli sepsis according to infection site.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Real-world usage, effectiveness, and microbiological features of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice in China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a new cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that received clinical approval in China in 2019. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of Methods: Patients who used CAZ-AVI between January 2019 and April 2023 were identified through the hospital information system. Demographic information, details of the infection site, KP strain's drug sensitivity report, treatment duration, combination therapies, adverse drug reactions (ADR), and 28-day survival were recorded. Clinical and microbiological efficacies were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software to compare different infection sites and combination therapies. Results: The overall effective clinical response (CR) rate of CAZ-AVI against KP infection was 62.13%, with a favorable microbial response (MR) rate was 65.68% and a 28-day survival rate was 63.91%. No significant difference occurred in effective CR and 28-day survival rate among different infection sites ( Conclusion: CAZ-AVI demonstrates good clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of KP infections. The clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was similar across different infection sites, and combination therapy did not show an advantage over monotherapy. Further studies are warranted. It should be noted that CAZ-AVI may induce thrombocytopenia and hematuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.