Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023388›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2023

Multi-Model Prediction of West Nile Virus Neuroinvasive Disease With Machine Learning for Identification of Important Regional Climatic Drivers.

Karen M Holcomb, J Erin Staples, Randall J Nett, Charles B Beard, Lyle R Petersen, Stanley G Benjamin, Benjamin W Green, Hunter Jones, Michael A Johansson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. West Nile virus unmasked: from gene variability to future challenges.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen M HolcombGlobal Systems Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-3756
J Erin StaplesDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fort Collins CO USA.
Randall J NettDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fort Collins CO USA.
Charles B BeardDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fort Collins CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4467-2020
Lyle R PetersenDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fort Collins CO USA.
Stanley G BenjaminGlobal Systems Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-8236
Benjamin W GreenGlobal Systems Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-094X
Hunter JonesClimate Prediction Office National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4588-3911
Michael A JohanssonDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention San Juan PR USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-7722

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

West Nile virus (WNV) is the leading cause of mosquito-borne illness in the continental United States (CONUS). Spatial heterogeneity in historical incidence, environmental factors, and complex ecology make prediction of spatiotemporal variation in WNV transmission challenging. Machine learning provides promising tools for identification of important variables in such situations. To predict annual WNV neuroinvasive disease (WNND) cases in CONUS (2015-2021), we fitted 10 probabilistic models with variation in complexity from naïve to machine learning algorithm and an ensemble. We made predictions in each of nine climate regions on a hexagonal grid and evaluated each model's predictive accuracy. Using the machine learning models (random forest and neural network), we identified the relative importance and variation in ranking of predictors (historical WNND cases, climate anomalies, human demographics, and land use) across regions. We found that historical WNND cases and population density were among the most important factors while anomalies in temperature and precipitation often had relatively low importance. While the relative performance of each model varied across climatic regions, the magnitude of difference between models was small. All models except the naïve model had non-significant differences in performance relative to the baseline model (negative binomial model fit per hexagon). No model, including the ensemble or more complex machine learning models, outperformed models based on historical case counts on the hexagon or region level; these models are good forecasting benchmarks. Further work is needed to assess if predictive capacity can be improved beyond that of these historical baselines.

Indexed as

climatemachine learningpredictionvariable importanceWest Nile virus

Identifiers

PMID38023388
PMCPMC10654557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.