Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023347›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2023

Getting it right: Teaching undergraduate biology to undermine racial essentialism.

Elaine Guevara, Shyamalika Gopalan, Dashiell J Massey, Mayowa Adegboyega, Wen Zhou, Alma Solis, Alisha D Anaya, Steven E Churchill, Joseph Feldblum, Richard R Lawler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience.Evolutionary human sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Genes, culture, and scientific racism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elaine GuevaraDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-474X
Shyamalika GopalanDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Dashiell J MasseyDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-8949
Mayowa AdegboyegaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Wen ZhouDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Alma SolisDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-3767
Alisha D AnayaDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Steven E ChurchillDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Joseph FeldblumDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27713, United States.
Richard R LawlerDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, United States.
Duke University · USJames Madison University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How we teach human genetics matters for social equity. The biology curriculum appears to be a crucial locus of intervention for either reinforcing or undermining students' racial essentialist views. The Mendelian genetic models dominating textbooks, particularly in combination with racially inflected language sometimes used when teaching about monogenic disorders, can increase middle and high school students' racial essentialism and opposition to policies to increase equity. These findings are of particular concern given the increasing spread of racist misinformation online and the misappropriation of human genomics research by white supremacists, who take advantage of low levels of genetics literacy in the general public. Encouragingly, however, teaching updated information about the geographical distribution of human genetic variation and the complex, multifactorial basis of most human traits, reduces students' endorsement of racial essentialism. The genetics curriculum is therefore a key tool in combating misinformation and scientific racism. Here, we describe a framework and example teaching materials for teaching students key concepts in genetics, human evolutionary history, and human phenotypic variation at the undergraduate level. This framework can be flexibly applied in biology and anthropology classes and adjusted based on time availability. Our goal is to provide undergraduate-level instructors with varying levels of expertise with a set of evidence-informed tools for teaching human genetics to combat scientific racism, including an evolving set of instructional resources, as well as learning goals and pedagogical approaches. Resources can be found at https://noto.li/YIlhZ5. Additionally, we hope to generate conversation about integrating modern genetics into the undergraduate curriculum, in light of recent findings about the risks and opportunities associated with teaching genetics.

Indexed as

curriculumevolutionary geneticspedagogyscience educationSTEMteaching materials

Identifiers

PMID38023347
PMCPMC10674104
OpenAlexW4388608495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.