Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023300›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2023

Building lexicon-based sentiment analysis model for low-resource languages.

Idi Mohammed, Rajesh Prasad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Idi MohammedComputer Science Department, African University of Science and Technology, Abuja, Nigeria.
Rajesh PrasadComputer Science Department, African University of Science and Technology, Abuja, Nigeria.
African Institute of Science and Technology · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has transformed machine translation, sentiment analysis, information retrieval, and conversation systems. NLP applications rely on complete linguistic resources, which might be difficult for low-resource languages. NLP solutions for every language require a language-specific dataset. Dataset in a language is essential for NLP solution creation. Over 7000 languages are spoken worldwide. Only around 20 languages have text corpora for NLP applications. English has the most datasets, then Chinese and Spanish. Japanese has several Western European language datasets. For an accurate NLP system, most Asian and African languages lack training datasets. To address this challenge, we propose a methodology for building a lexicon-based sentiment analysis model for languages with limited resources. The Hausa language was used as training and evaluation language. The methodology combines lexicon creation; augmentation, annotation, and fine-tuning model, and has been tested on a corpus of Hausa tweets achieving an accuracy of 98 %. The results suggest that our proposed model is a promising tool for sentiment analysis in a variety of applications, such as social media monitoring, customer service, and market research. Our methodology can be used for any low-resource language. The outline of the work done in this paper can be shown as follows:•We propose a methodology for building a lexicon-based sentiment analysis model for languages with limited resources, using the Hausa language as a case study.•The methodology combines lexicon creation, augmentation, annotation, and fine-tuning model, and achieves an accuracy of 98 % on a corpus of Hausa tweets.•The results suggest that the proposed model is a promising tool for sentiment analysis in a variety of applications for low-resource languages.

Indexed as

Building a lexicon-based sentiment analysis Model for low-resource languageFine-tuningHausa languageLexicon dictionaryLow-resource languagesSentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID38023300
PMCPMC10630646
OpenAlexW4387860610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.