Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023290›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2023

Is the Urinary and Gut Microbiome Associated With Bladder Cancer?

Joanna Chorbińska, Wojciech Krajewski, Łukasz Nowak, Klaudia Bardowska, Paulina Żebrowska-Różańska, Łukasz Łaczmański, Katarzyna Pacyga-Prus, Sabina Górska, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Urinary Microbiota and the Gut-Bladder Axis in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Microbiome impacts quality of life in patients with endometrial cancer and benign gynecological conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Streptococcus anginosus: the potential role in the progression of gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna ChorbińskaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-4450
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Łukasz NowakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4273-8196
Klaudia BardowskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Paulina Żebrowska-RóżańskaLaboratory of Genomics & Bioinformatics, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Łukasz ŁaczmańskiLaboratory of Genomics & Bioinformatics, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Katarzyna Pacyga-PrusLaboratory of Microbiome Immunobiology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Sabina GórskaLaboratory of Microbiome Immunobiology, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-3753
Tomasz SzydełkoUniversity Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microbiome dysbiosis plays a role in the pathogenesis of many urological diseases, including bladder cancer (BC). The aim of the study was to compare the urinary and gut microbiota of patients with BC with a healthy control (HC) group. Methods: The study group included patients hospitalized in 2020 to 2021 with diagnosed BC and HC. Prior to the transurethral resection of bladder tumor, patients collected their urine and stool which was then subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Results: Overall, 25 patients were enrolled in the study: 18 in the BC group and 7 in the HC group. Analysis of the urine and stool microbiome showed no statistically significant differences between patients with BC and HC in alpha diversity, beta diversity, and difference in taxa relative abundance. Detailed analysis of urine and stool microbiome depending on patient- and tumor-related characteristics also showed no statistically significant differences in alpha diversity and beta diversity. Differences in abundance (ANCOM) were noted in both types of samples in patients with BC. In the urine test, genus Conclusions: The microbiome of urine and stool of patients with BC does not differ significantly from that of HC; however, its composition in patients with BC varies according to the patient's sex.

Indexed as

bladder cancerMicrobiomemicrobiotaurobiomeurothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID38023290
PMCPMC10644734
OpenAlexW4388641467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.