Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023233›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

An open-source nnU-net algorithm for automatic segmentation of MRI scans in the male pelvis for adaptive radiotherapy.

Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen, Bahar Celik, Nis Sarup, Lars Dysager, Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Uffe Bernchou, Søren Nielsen Agergaard, Maximilian Lukas Konrad, Carsten Brink and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ebbe Laugaard LorenzenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Bahar CelikLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Nis SarupLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lars DysagerDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Rasmus Lübeck ChristiansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anders Smedegaard BertelsenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Uffe BernchouLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Søren Nielsen AgergaardLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Maximilian Lukas KonradLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Carsten BrinkLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Faisal MahmoodLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Tine SchytteDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Christina Junker NyborgDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) requires accurate and efficient segmentation of organs and targets on MRI scans. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and variable, while deformable image registration (DIR)-based contour propagation may not account for large anatomical changes. Therefore, we developed and evaluated an automatic segmentation method using the nnU-net framework. Methods: The network was trained on 38 patients (76 scans) with localized prostate cancer and tested on 30 patients (60 scans) with localized prostate, metastatic prostate, or bladder cancer treated at a 1.5 T MRI-linac at our institution. The performance of the network was compared with the current clinical workflow based on DIR. The segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD) metrics. Results: The trained network successfully segmented all 600 structures in the test set. High similarity was obtained for most structures, with 90% of the contours having a DSC above 0.9 and 86% having an MSD below 1 mm. The largest discrepancies were found in the sigmoid and colon structures. Stratified analysis on cancer type showed that the best performance was seen in the same type of patients that the model was trained on (localized prostate). Especially in patients with bladder cancer, the performance was lower for the bladder and the surrounding organs. A complete automatic delineation workflow took approximately 1 minute. Compared with contour transfer based on the clinically used DIR algorithm, the nnU-net performed statistically better across all organs, with the most significant gain in using the nnU-net seen for organs subject to more considerable volumetric changes due to variation in the filling of the rectum, bladder, bowel, and sigmoid. Conclusion: We successfully trained and tested a network for automatically segmenting organs and targets for MRIgRT in the male pelvis region. Good test results were seen for the trained nnU-net, with test results outperforming the current clinical practice using DIR-based contour propagation at the 1.5 T MRI-linac. The trained network is sufficiently fast and accurate for clinical use in an online setting for MRIgRT. The model is provided as open-source.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapyautomatic segmentationMRI-guidednnU-netopen-sourcepelvissegmentationU-net

Identifiers

PMID38023233
PMCPMC10654998
OpenAlexW4388297959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.